User talk:Chrisjjj
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- All links to tango.info pages on this page have been changed to either wiki internal links or https-links. Tobiasco 15:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Why? Chrisjjj 13:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- mass_tagging#Setup - creates old-style references with leading zeros Tobiasco 2008-03-06T16:33:37 (UTC)
- It uses whatever leading zeros it receives from the source pathname Chrisjjj 2008-03-06T16:40:03 (UTC)
- propose: if change not too complicated, change it. reason: other part of filename is changed too, so maybe better to have a complete change to TINT standards mode. Tobiasco 2008-03-06T16:43:22 (UTC)
- agreed, though propose: tagger.php retain leading zero support for benefit of track reference generators less capable than Mp3tag Chrisjjj 2008-03-06T17:39:17 (UTC)
- change my opinion slightly. don't care so much about mp3tag. tagger.php could also generate TINT-strict output. Could help for other purposes. Since mp3tag is only for windows we should avoid it as much as we can. Tobiasco 2008-03-06T20:26:41 (UTC)
- How much is that? ;) Given we know no comparable tagger for non-Windows. Chrisjjj
- It uses whatever leading zeros it receives from the source pathname Chrisjjj 2008-03-06T16:40:03 (UTC)
- mass_tagging#Requirements - it maybe can all be moved to TINT based filing. we have to take care for sorting issues if people use different software to create TINT list and to tag. (issue posted to Talk:mass tagging) Tobiasco 2008-03-07T13:55:43 (UTC)
- Talk:TINT-based_filing wrote something Tobiasco 2008-03-29T22:54:59 (UTC)
- non ascii issue: http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?postid=2257726#post2257726 Tobiasco 2008-04-03T03:17:03 (UTC)
- you changed the TINT filing definition and this also implies a re-definition of TINT. Even if TINTslash is not a nice name, it shouldn't be imposed on TINT to be always TINT/. Tobiasco 2008-04-06T23:33:29 (UTC)
- "you changed the TINT filing definition" - please indentify the article change. "it shouldn't be imposed on TINT to be always TINT/" - it is not. Chrisjjj 2008-04-09T00:59:34 (UTC)
- see Talk:TINT-based_filing, which i redesigned a little. related definition change: https://tango.info/x/wiki/w/index.php?title=TINT&diff=12337&oldid=11819 - I undid this latter change Tobiasco 2008-04-09T02:05:45 (UTC)
- "see Talk:TINT-based_filing" - I see no TINT filing defintion change there. "related definition change:" - that change of yours is faulty in that TINT does not and (has never) allowed mixed separators. I have rectified it.
- see Talk:TINT-based_filing, which i redesigned a little. related definition change: https://tango.info/x/wiki/w/index.php?title=TINT&diff=12337&oldid=11819 - I undid this latter change Tobiasco 2008-04-09T02:05:45 (UTC)
- "you changed the TINT filing definition" - please indentify the article change. "it shouldn't be imposed on TINT to be always TINT/" - it is not. Chrisjjj 2008-04-09T00:59:34 (UTC)
- Talk:TINT I don not agree with the definition of the separators. Tobiasco 2008-04-10T00:22:09 (UTC)
- ping 00016728701327
- https://tango.info/x/wiki/w/index.php?title=DAP&diff=13586&oldid=13581 , there is no external redirect in mediawiki Tobiasco
- I thik you mean "no automatic redirect". That redirect worked manually as intended by me. Chrisjjj 2008-05-01T09:50:45 (UTC)
- User:Tobiasco/gmap new way to link Tobiasco 2008-05-02T13:38:55 (UTC)
- Thanks Chrisjjj 2008-05-03T16:02:54 (UTC)
- ping Talk:tango.info#Done
- data.tango.info tracks - discnumber example: i suggest "1/1 -> 1." qty shouldnt be there.
- why do you repeatedly delete information? [1], [2] Tobiasco 2008-10-14T18:39:04 (UTC)
- found a new special page: Special:Prefixindex/User:Chrisjjj or only subpages: Special:Prefixindex/User:Chrisjjj/
- ping replied to warning Tobiasco 2009-04-24T13:01:01 (UTC)
- (Re mass tagging with mp3tag wrote warning summary (https://tango.info/x/wiki/w/index.php?title=mass_tagging_with_mp3tag&diff=26312&oldid=26311), the other stuff can be deleted, I think. You may sign and improve the wording as you like. I don't know which tagger1.?.php I had the problem with. I tend to look for fixing only in 1.3 but think 1.3 needs some stuff to mimmick the wanted behavior of 1.0. I have to write a field (tag) spec, when done I would like your input, because I don't use mp3tag anymore and am not so good with mp3tag standard field names. Tobiasco 2009-04-24T20:12:59 (UTC)
- [3] re word, add question. Tobiasco 2009-05-02T10:59:07 (UTC)
- http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:YouTube_%28Iubito%29#Usage - to include videos, extension is installed here. Tobiasco 2009-08-04T21:56:44 (UTC)
- "here" https://tango.info/x/wiki/w/index.php?title=tango.info_number&diff=30948&oldid=30939 makes not much sense in the text overthere
- looks fine to me Chrisjjj
- https://tango.info/x/wiki/w/index.php?title=tango.info_wiki_content_guidelines&diff=36873&oldid=32221 Tobiasco 13:03, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
2013-06-12
Page User:Chrisjjj has been "rolled back" (reverted)[4] to the latest version that did not violate the content guidelines. Tobiasco 20:10, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
This is false. The latest version that does not violate those guidelines is https://tango.info/x/wiki/w/index.php?title=User:Chrisjjj&oldid=55941 . Also, this reversion fails to accord with that version's prohibition on others editing/modifying pages in this user space. Chrisjjj 21:41, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- How that, when regarding the content guidelines violation:
- that version contains a section marked with "="
- the guidelines contains the text: /Sections headings to be marked with at least level 2, i.e. "=="/
- regarding the reversion:
- the reversion was done by an administrator
- the guidelines contains the text: /User pages (except User talk pages) may be created/edited only by that user or administrators./
- Tobiasco (talk) 2023-01-03T16:19:41 (CET)
User talk:Chrisjjj/naming policies
copy from User talk:Chrisjjj/naming policies (as of now the only user talk subpage in the wiki, will be deleted immediately)
- Album (title) - the album title. Excludes collection name. Excludes artist name unless unambigiously included in source.
"unambigiously included in source" needs clarification or example Tobiasco 18:38, 19 November 2007 (CET)